Nå er det ny storm i nettavisene om farlige lavkarbo. En norsk studie viser hvordan et lavkarbokosthold kan øke risikoen for hjerte- karsykdom. I artikkelen til DN henviser de også til studien som ble publisert i fjor som viste at lavkarbodiett øker risikoen for både hjertesykdom og slag. 44.000 svenske kvinner ble undersøkt på starten av 90-tallet og fulgt opp 15 år senere. Denne har jeg omtalt tidligere. Det provoserer meg faktisk enda at de kaller den for «Lavkarbo». Visste du om lavkarbo på tidlig 90 tall?
Pål Jåbekk kommenterer den nye studien på bloggen sin og på Fitnessbloggen, så du har sikkert fått den med deg. Jeg har også linket til den på facebook siden min og på twitter. Mitt bidrag i denne sammenhengen er en artikkel som jeg synes du bør lese. Den handler slett ikke om kolesterol. Jeg kobler problemstillingen opp mot psykologien og det Pål skriver om «Idioter i flokk» trekkes her ned på individnivå:
In an uncertain world, people love to be right because it helps us make sense of things. Indeed some psychologists think it’s akin to a basic drive.
One of the ways they strive to be correct is by looking for evidence that confirms they are correct, sometimes with depressing or comic results:
- A woman hires a worker that turns out to be incompetent. She doesn’t notice that everyone else is doing his work for him because she is so impressed that he shows up every day, right on time.
- A sports fan who believes his team is the best only seems to remember the matches they won and none of the embarrassing defeats to inferior opponents.
- A man who loves the country life, but has to move to the city for a new job, ignores the flight-path he lives under and noisy-neighbours-from-hell and tells you how much he enjoys the farmer’s market and tending his window box.
We do it automatically, usually without realising. We do it partly because it’s easier to see where new pieces fit into the picture-puzzle we are working on, rather than imagining a new picture. It also helps shore up our vision of ourselves as accurate, right-thinking, consistent people who know what’s what.
Psychologists call it the confirmation bias and it creeps into all sorts of areas of our lives. Here are a few examples:
«Hey, you look great, have you done something different with your hair?»
Who doesn’t like a compliment? No one. It doesn’t even have to be sincerely delivered, I’ll take it. But what about…
«Hey, you’re a real slime-ball, you know that?»
Who likes insults? Well, we don’t exactly like them but—believe it or not—sometimes we seek them out if they confirm our view of ourselves.
In a study that examined this, people actually sought out information confirming their own view that they were—not exactly slime-balls—but lazy, or slow-witted or not very athletic (Swann et al., 1989).
And this isn’t some kind of self-hating thing; in this study even people with high self-esteem sought out information that confirmed their own negative self-views.
It seems we like to be right, even at a cost to our self-image.
A study of online stock market investors has looked at how they gathered information about a prospective stock (Park et al., 2010).
The researchers found the confirmation bias writ large. Investors mostly looked for information that confirmed their hunch about a particular stock. Those people who displayed the strongest confirmation bias were the most over-confident investors and consequently made the least money.
It seems we like to be right, even if it costs us money.
People see what they want to see in politics all the time.
The most ironic example is in satire. Often satire uses sarcasm to make its point: TV satirist Stephen Colbert frequently says the opposite of what he really thinks to make his point (amongst comedians I believe these are called ‘jokes’).
Except the irony is that one study has shown that people who don’t agree with Colbert don’t get that he’s being sarcastic, they think he really means it (LaMarre, 2009).
The beauty is that both liberals and conservatives get what they want: their viewpoints confirmed.
It seems we like to be right, even if it means not getting the joke.
Blame it on the bias
Over the years the confirmation bias has picked up the blame for all sorts of dodgy beliefs. Here are a few:
- People are prejudiced (partly) because they only notice facts which fit with their preconceived notions about other nations or ethnicities.
- People believe weird stuff about flying saucers, the JFK assassination, astrology, Egyptian pyramids and the moon landings because they only look for confirmation not dis-confirmation.
- In the early nineteenth century doctors treated any old disease with blood-letting. Their patients sometimes got better so doctors—who conveniently ignored all the people who died—figured it must be doing something. In fact for many ailments some people will always get better on their own without any treatment at all.
Fight the bias
The way to fight the confirmation bias is simple to state but hard to put into practice.
You have to try and think up and test out alternative hypothesis. Sounds easy, but it’s not in our nature. It’s no fun thinking about why we might be misguided or have been misinformed. It takes a bit of effort.
It’s distasteful reading a book which challenges our political beliefs, or considering criticisms of our favourite film or, even, accepting how different people choose to live their lives.
Trying to be just a little bit more open is part of the challenge that the confirmation bias sets us. Can we entertain those doubts for just a little longer? Can we even let the facts sway us and perform that most fantastical of feats: changing our minds?